The Safety of Steak Tartare

Jesse–

Recently a chef tried telling me that Steak Tartare is perfectly safe to eat, that I shouldn’t worry about the possibility of E. coli contamination. He claimed that the spinach outbreak of 2006 was evidence that leafy greens are more dangerous than meats. That doesn’t seem quite right to me. What do you have to say on the subject?

–A reader in MA

Steak tartare is ground, raw beef. As it is served raw, it is no different than any other raw meat product and it carries with it the risk of bacterial infection. Specifically, as beef, it can be tainted with E. coli. E. coli is naturally present in a cattle’s digestive system and during the slaughtering process, the cattle’s intestines can be torn apart, resulting in the meat being splattered with fecal matter. While the beef is washed before it is further processed, packaged, and sold, some bacteria may remain on the surface, resulting in a surface contamination.

When somebody cooks a steak, any surface contamination of bacteria is killed quickly as the heat is applied to the outside of the meat; and therefore eating a steak rare or medium rare is generally safe, assuming that the meat was procured from an appropriately slaughtered, healthy animal and held according to best practices (at temperatures of 40 F or lower) for an appropriate time frame.

Grinding the meat complicates the picture, as the meat that was on the surface is mashed up with the meat that was in the interior; and the act of grinding creates a great deal more surface area for bacteria to grow on. Basically, any bacteria that was on the outside is mashed in with the meat from the inside, thereby giving the bacteria more food on which to thrive and grow. This is why many restaurants will ask you what temperature you want them to cook a steak to, but will cook a hamburger to well-done unless specifically requested not to.

Steak tartare is a fancy dish (even if it is just raw ground meat). It is generally ground from the better cuts of meat, and ground in the restaurant where it is served in small batches (as compared to being ground in 10,000+ pound batches at a meat processing plant in Chicago where the beef scraps of thousands of cattle are co-mingled in an industrial grinder). Processing the meat in small batches reduces the risk of bacterial infection because there is less meat; and if there is a problem with one piece of meat, the contamination will be limited to that batch. The restaurant may even trim the surface meat away and use it for other purposes so as to further reduce the risk.

But even if they adhere to all of those precautions, and grind it in a refrigerated room, there is still a greater chance of bacteria being carried from the surface of the meat to the interior and therefore transmitted to the dining public with raw beef than there is with cooked beef. The knife that cuts off the surface meat may carry bacteria into the meat that remains; then the bacteria may be ground up into the rest of the beef. Such an incident should be rare, and therefore if the beef has been properly handled, and is fresh, steak tartare can probably be eaten safely by most people who don’t have weakened immune systems.

But it is foolish to suggest that spinach is more dangerous than raw ground beef simply because the last outbreak came from spinach. In fact, according to the FDA report on the spinach outbreak, “Potential environmental risk factors for E.coli O157:H7 contamination at or near the field included the presence of wild pigs, the proximity of irrigation wells used to grow produce for ready-to-eat packaging, and surface waterways exposed to feces from cattle and wildlife”(http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2007/NEW01593.html). In short, beef sh_t in the irrigation water was likely to blame for the E. coli infection in the spinach.

If somebody enjoys steak tartare, they should continue to enjoy it, assuming that they trust the cleanliness of the restaurant preparing it. But no one should fool themselves into thinking that it is a risk-free delicacy. I myself have no interest in it—if I’m going to eat ground beef, I would like it to be cooked, please.

I hope this answers any questions you have about the topic, and that the somewhat graphic descriptions about the meat processing process don’t unnecessarily scare you away from beef. I would, however, encourage you to do some research into the feedlot system through which the overwhelming majority of our nation’s beef cattle are processed and learn more about where the beef comes from. Unfortunately, modern factory farming methods lead to most beef being pumped full of a list of hormones that would make the scientists at Balco blush; and the diet of corn and the confinement practices common at the feedlots require that the processors feed the cattle a steady diet of antibiotics in order to maintain the animals’ health until such time as they can be slaughtered.

As such, I would recommend against eating steak tartare unless you know for certain that the cattle was fed a diet of grass and allowed to graze at pasture until it was slaughtered. A cattle that led a healthy life is less likely to have suffered from illness than a cattle that was subjected to confinement, especially since the practice of confinement requires the cattle to basically stand around in their own filth, thereby increasing the possibility that fecal matter from outside of the cow will infect the beef at the time of slaughter.

I know I’m getting into more detail about more questions than you asked, but all of these issues are so interconnected that in order to paint a realistic picture for you of what the dangers are and where they come from, it’s somewhat necessary to give a broad outline of the system as a whole. If you are interested in finding grass-fed beef near where you live, contact your local agricultural extension service (generally run out of a state agricultural university, though they sometimes have satellite offices in cities; the UMASS extension service web page is here) and ask about local beef farmers. They should be able to put you in touch with several, and from there you can talk to the farmers and find out how they raise their beef.

12 Responses to “The Safety of Steak Tartare”

  1. Juen Says:

    “When somebody cooks a steak, any surface contamination of bacteria is killed quickly as the heat is applied to the outside of the meat; and therefore eating a steak rare or medium rare is generally safe…”

    Jesse, I made a similar statement back when I was in graduate school (in Food Science) was was corrected by one of my professors. Mechanical methods can be used to tenderize steaks - multiprong pointy tools (kind of like a giant fork, I guess) or blades are used to stab pieces of meat repeatedly to break up the hard and fibrous areas. Thus, if the piece has surface contamination, it goes right into the center with every stab.

  2. Elayne Riggs Says:

    “…herefore eating a steak rare or medium rare is generally safe…” But not necessarily a good idea even so. The human body has evolved to digest cooked meat far better than undercooked meat. I live for the day when chefs will once more remember and acknowledge this, and we will be through with the fad of undercooked meat and all its attendant bathroom problems. :)

  3. dan h Says:

    I often eat raw beef, both ground like beef tartare, or just sliced thin like a carpaccio. It hasn’t caused me any digestive problems yet, but I only buy beef from the local butcher.

  4. jwsharrard Says:

    Juen—That’s a different situation entirely. But if you’re grilling a strip steak, a porterhouse, a tenderloin; basically any steak that’s naturally tender, there’s no need for mechanical tenderization techniques. That would be something along the lines of a salisbury steak, which is a different situation altogether and more along the lines of ground meat because, as you point out, you’re introducing the surface bacteria into the center through the tenderization process.

    Elayne–that’s why you get the choice of how well done you order your meat. No one is going to foist a medium rare steak upon you if you prefer medium-well or well. If you prefer a more well done steak, order it more well done. Just don’t complain that it’s dry and tough afterwards. I once cooked for a banquet of people that all ordered their steaks either “well done” or “extra well done” and then were upset when the steaks arrived to their table in the condition that they requested.

  5. tensai Says:

    “E. coli is naturally present in a cattle’s digestive system”

    This is true, as it’s true of most mammals including humans. One interesting fact though is that grass fed beef have far fewer (300x fewer, according to a Cornell study) E. Coli than grain fed beef and of those that are found in grass fed beef, they are much less likely to survive the human stomach. The reason is that corn feed raises the pH level of a cow’s stomach more closely matching a human’s. That in turn means that the E. Coli who survive a cow’s stomach, will survive in yours.

    Just another example of how traditional farming methods, you know the ones that sustained our race for thousands of years, are better than modern industrial version.

  6. jwsharrard Says:

    Hear, hear—exactly why I recommended eating grass fed, but with the statistical information I didn’t have at my fingertips!

  7. June Says:

    Ha, I mistyped my own name in the earlier comment. Anyway, tensai’s comment has a minor mistake - corn feed *lowers* cow rumen pH.

    This page has a nice explanation about why giving a cow grass to eat even for a week before slaughter can help reduce E. coli counts:
    http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/sn_arc98/9_19_98/food.htm

    I think the Cornell study that tensai refers to is this one:
    http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/281/5383/1666

  8. Keith Says:

    Well, how about irradiating meat? You can kill all the bacteria or other icky tiny things without cooking it. Once it’s irradiated, the risk introduced by grinding it or chopping it with clean utensils is roughly similar to the risk introduced by cutting a cooked-but-cooled piece of meat, namely: barely any at all, provided the food is consumed quickly.

    I’d not hesitate to try raw meat if it had been irradiated to kill microbes, then properly stored and prepped in a clean manner.

  9. EPOC Says:

    That is true, irradiating with beta waves or gamma rays should do the trick!

  10. Andrew Says:

    Juen — You tard. how long do you think man has been aware of cooked meat? The idea that the reason for safety is evolutionary is just lazy on your part. I hope you have fun at the Cornell Club discussing other fanciful and seemingly educated guesses as I’m quite sure those are the only sort of false erudite folk who will listen to your nonsense.

  11. Tom Says:

    Andrew, you “tard,” it was Elaine that made the comment regarding evolution. If you are going to call someone retarded, then at least have the mental capacity to name the correct person. There should be some sort of “Boy did I put my foot in my mouth” medal just to award you for your comment! The actual poster made no mention of Cornell, either, something else you got from the wrong post, wow! Some people should simply not continue to receive oxygen priviliges…

  12. brent Says:

    I’m not an expert. But, ironically i think your chef is correct. Remember exposure and time are your enemies. I shaved piece of meat that is freshing ground, will get exposed just salt it and eat right away..

Leave a Reply